Véronique STEYER 2013 Hervé LAROCHE Book review : Davis R . GIBSON 2012 Talk at the Brink . Deliberation and Decision
نویسندگان
چکیده
Jean-Luc Arrègle, EMLYON Business School (editor) Laure Cabantous, Cass Business School (editor) Stewart Clegg, University of Technology, Sydney (editor) Olivier Germain, Université du Québec à Montréal (editor, book reviews) Karim Mignonac, Université de Toulouse 1 (editor) Philippe Monin, EMLYON Business School (editor) Tyrone Pitsis, University of Newcastle (editor) José Pla-Barber, Universidad de València (editor) Michael Tushman, Harvard Business School (editor)
منابع مشابه
Patient Engagement and its Evaluation Tools – Current Challenges and Future Directions; Comment on “Metrics and Evaluation Tools for Patient Engagement in Healthcare Organization- and System-Level Decision-Making: A Systematic Review”
Considering the growing recognition of the importance of patient engagement in healthcare decisions, research and delivery systems, it is important to ensure high quality and efficient patient engagement evaluation tools. In this commentary, we will first highlight the definition and importance of patient engagement. Then we discuss the psychometric properties of the patient engagement evaluati...
متن کاملA three-talk model for shared decision making: multistage consultation process
Objectives To revise an existing three-talk model for learning how to achieve shared decision making, and to consult with relevant stakeholders to update and obtain wider engagement.Design Multistage consultation process.Setting Key informant group, communities of interest, and survey of clinical specialties.Participants 19 key informants, 153 member responses from multiple communities of inter...
متن کاملCombining deliberation and intuition in patient decision support.
OBJECTIVE To review the strengths and weaknesses of deliberative and intuitive processes in the context of patient decision support and to discuss implications for decision aid (DA) design. METHODS Conceptual review of the strengths and weaknesses of intuitive and analytical decision making and applying these findings to the practice of DA design. RESULTS DAs combine several important goals...
متن کاملReasons and Inclusion: The Foundation of Deliberation*
This article provides two empirical evaluations of deliberation. Given that scholars of deliberation often argue for its importance without empirical support, we first examine whether there is a “deliberative difference”; if actors engaging in deliberation arrive at different decisions than those who think on their own or “just talk.” As we find a general convergence within deliberation scholar...
متن کاملبررسی زمینههای قرآنی عناوین منازل السائرین بر اساس محور جانشینی
Tendency to spirituality and religious mystical views at the contemporary era and urgent need to review the mystical texts, makes researchers have a review at the mystical works of previous eras. On the one hand, attitudes with mystical interpretation or mystical approach to Holy Quran, simplify the language of this book for understanding of the today audiences. In the marketing of various myst...
متن کامل